Skip to content

Discussion of End-of-Life Care: Disability Factor Comes to Forefront

Activists opposed to validism advocate for the left to challenge a 'valueless and hazardous' bill, while other organizations strive to guarantee that the upcoming right to assisted dying may not be denied or forced upon individuals due to their disability status.

Opponents of validism are urging the left to resist a 'worthless and risky' bill, while other...
Opponents of validism are urging the left to resist a 'worthless and risky' bill, while other groups aim to safeguard that the fresh right to assisted dying is neither rejected nor forced upon individuals due to disabilities.

Discussion of End-of-Life Care: Disability Factor Comes to Forefront

Amidst spirited discussions at France's National Assembly, the proposed legislation regarding the right to assisted dying has ignited a contentious debate surrounding the boundary between illness and disability, and the prioritization of individual liberty versus ensuring genuine healthcare equality and solidarity for the most vulnerable. The Assembly commenced deliberations on the matter on May 12, with discussions scheduled to conclude on May 27.

Several anti-euthanasia advocacy groups have expressed vigorous opposition to the bill, raising valid concerns about potential systemic discrimination against disabled individuals. groups such as Handi-social, Until Solidarity, and the Collective for Equality and Emancipation through Struggle and Disability denounce this proposed legislation. Alice Ohayon, vice-treasurer of the Devalideuses, boldly states, "As a disabled person, one often hears remarks such as 'I couldn't do it' or 'If I were in your place, I'd commit suicide.' Disability is frequently portrayed as life's worst possible outcome. However, what we yearn for is not death, but rights."

The existing Claeys-Leonetti law, which permits "deep and continuous sedation until death" in specific circumstances, already addresses most relevant scenarios. Alice Ohayon suggests that the government's primary focus should be on ensuring decent living conditions and eliminating discrimination against disabled individuals. This approach would help prevent disabled people from being disregarded by society or their loved ones as a burden.

The debate on this bill is far from over, with crucial concerns regarding its implications for disabled people still lingering. Key issues under dispute include the bill's potential for broader eligibility to assisted dying, the insufficient protective measures for vulnerable populations, and conflicting interpretations of human rights principles. While proponents argue that the legislation serves to uphold personal autonomy and aligns with disability rights, critics fear it may instigate systemic discrimination and undermine support for those with disabilities.

As the discussions continue, it is hoped that a balanced and nuanced decision will emerge, one that acknowledges the value and dignity of all lives regardless of ability and affirms the commitment to equality and solidarity for all members of society.

  1. The debate on the proposed legislation in France's National Assembly, which could affect the right to assisted dying, has also sparked discussions about mental health and health-and-wellness, as advocacy groups like Handi-social, Until Solidarity, and the Collective for Equality and Emancipation through Struggle and Disability question the potential discrimination against disabled individuals.
  2. Alice Ohayon, a prominent figure in the Devalideuses, argues that instead of focusing on assisted dying, the government should prioritize science, specifically in addressing issues related to disability and mental health, by ensuring decent living conditions, eliminating discrimination, and supporting the rights of disabled individuals.

Read also:

    Latest