FDA faces pressure to tighten rules on ultra-processed foods amid health crisis
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is set to review a petition calling for stricter controls on ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Former FDA chief David Kessler has urged the agency to revoke the 'Generally Recognized As Safe' (GRAS) status of certain ingredients found in many processed foods, which currently face little regulation before entering the market.
Kessler's petition focuses on 'processed refined carbohydrates', arguing they cause metabolic harm. He wants these ingredients reclassified as additives, forcing manufacturers to prove their safety before use. His move comes as UPFs now account for 55% of Americans' calorie intake, with children consuming even higher amounts.
Meanwhile, the government is working on an official definition for ultra-processed foods. Some states have already banned them from schools over health concerns. Congress is also debating a bill that would stop UPFs from being marketed to children and introduce warning labels on packaging.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr confirmed the FDA will respond to Kessler's petition. However, the agency's stance remains unclear, as does Kennedy's broader commitment to regulating UPFs. The FDA has not disclosed how many UPF ingredients fall under the GRAS programme or how often they undergo review.
The petition could lead to tighter rules on processed food ingredients if the FDA acts. A decision would affect manufacturers, schools, and marketing practices. For now, the agency's next steps—and the impact on public health—remain uncertain.
