Skip to content

Flawed Dog Nutrition Study Sparks Debate Over Fresh Food Benefits

What if the latest ‘breakthrough’ in dog nutrition isn’t reliable? Critics dismantle a study’s claims about fresh food—and demand better science.

In this picture we can see food items and on the food there are some ingredients.
In this picture we can see food items and on the food there are some ingredients.

Flawed Dog Nutrition Study Sparks Debate Over Fresh Food Benefits

A recent study on dog nutrition has come under fire for major flaws in its design and findings. Published in Metabolites on October 17, 2025, the research claimed that fresh, human-grade dog food improves metabolic health in older dogs. However, BSM Partners has now raised serious concerns about its accuracy and methodology. The study, led by Dr. Heather Huson, compared two dog foods with different processing methods and nutrient levels. It concluded that fresh, minimally processed dog food could support healthier aging in senior dogs. But BSM Partners argued that the study’s design made it impossible to pinpoint the actual cause of the results. The challenges raised by BSM Partners highlight significant concerns about the study’s reliability. Without clearer methods, accurate nutrient reporting, and a more representative diet comparison, the findings remain in doubt. The debate underscores the need for stricter scrutiny in pet nutrition research.

Read also:

Latest