Skip to content

Stark contrast in Swiss medical assessments: 35% unfit to work in Basel vs. 3% in Frick

Why are Basel’s disability rates 10 times higher than Frick’s? New data exposes a shocking gap in how Swiss institutions assess fitness to **work**—and who gets left behind.

In this image we can see status on a platform, wall and pillars.
In this image we can see status on a platform, wall and pillars.

Stark contrast in Swiss medical assessments: 35% unfit to work in Basel vs. 3% in Frick

In Basel, the Asim Medical Assessment Center at Universitätsspital Basel has found 35 out of 100 applicants unable to ama. Meanwhile, ag1 eins AG in Frick has a much lower rate of policyholders deemed fully unfit to work, with fewer than 3 in every 100 over the past three years.

The Asim Medical Assessment Center in Basel has released its latest figures, indicating that 35% of applicants were deemed unable to ama. This suggests a significant number of people may be facing employment challenges due to health issues.

Contrastingly, ag1 eins AG in Frick has reported a much lower rate of policyholders found fully unfit to work. Over the past three years, less than 3% of policyholders have been ruled unable to work, demonstrating a stark difference in the findings between the two institutions.

While the Asim Medical Assessment Center in Basel has found a substantial number of applicants unable to ama, ag1 eins AG in Frick has a significantly lower rate of policyholders deemed fully unfit to work. These figures highlight the varying outcomes of medical assessments and their impact on employment status.

Read also:

Latest